M Savers - Value for Money?

Morrisons and Coley Porter Bell (CPB) have almost finished the largest rebrand of 2011.  The purpose of the rebrand is to increase market share of their own label offering, presumably both in house and from the other major Mults.

Included in the rebrand is a new name; M Savers, not to be confused with Superdrug Savers.
I presume this has been done to clearly communicate the brand message, but it is nothing more than a distraction on the packaging and a new buzz word floating around head office.

We are told that 'The new designs confidently express the Morrisons brand with an iconic charcoal grey roundel bearing the letter M in white'. There is nothing iconic when  you have just created it. To be iconic it must be instantly recognisable, which to do so would need to be yellow and green.
We know however that this would add two extra colours to the packaging, a big no no for value packaging.
Dieline states this is a Beautiful example of a two color packaging for a value product line!
I presume they therefore are counting grey and the main spot. Not all of the packaging will come in a white substrate (look at the fairy cakes below) so instantly we need to add a white. there will also be a black for the barcode and eyemark. Now if the rest of the range will not be made from CMYK and a spot per packaging that will be 350 colours added to your supply chain complexity and a big pat on the back from Sun Chemicals. I would guess all these pieces are on average anywhere between 3 and 4 colours. This would explain why we now have an 'Iconic' grey roundall.  I'm very surprised CPB have created a range introducing over 350 colours when the existing has a total portfolio of 2 core colours.





Moving onto the illustration I have reservations. This style is very now, something which value ranges don't necessarily chase, the reason being is that when this trend finishes and is no longer cool, it's very expensive to change. I feel that Morrisons are already behind, this style has been around for sometime and roll-out is scheduled over the next 18 months. Even one of the Mult already does this style....
Packaging will have moved direction before the range has even been fully implemented. 


I can tell that Morrisons have done a lot of research about what we as a consumer wants.
CPB state "Research shows that consumers are often ashamed to be seen with them. But with the economy stalled for the foreseeable future, value ranges will be competing on more than just price. We wondered why shouldn’t entry level products have some charm and engagement?”
The problem with research is that it is based around the questions asked, ask the wrong questions and it doesn't matter if the answer is right.

My personal opinion is that i'm never ashamed of the basic print on value ranges i'm ashamed of the block colour and it's always been block white that makes me go most red.  So whilst the design is quirky on some levels it still going to be hidden at the bottom of my trolley, albeit not as obvious as the yellow and green of current.

Question: Does the M Savers Bitter look charming or cheap?



I'm going to put my hat in the ring and say that this new design will perform worse than what is currently on shelf. For a range of products that is all about price it's important to get noticed, something that the existing design does in abundance.


16/1/12
Since going to press I have been back into store and can confirm my worst fears, the new brand does disappear into the background. Now is the best time to review the packaging as it currently sits alongside the old yellow and green design, which for all it's flaws does stand out on shelf.  Another point worth noting is that some of the packs struggle for relevant imagery. I saw kitchen towels with an electronic mixing bowl, nappies using a dog and jam victoria sponge using just raspberries on pack. I think the consumer is going to struggle to navigate the aisles for the M Savers range and even when located the consumer may not be clear as to what the packaging represents. Most decisions are made in the blink of an eye.


I have written a secondary follow up blog to help explain the strong viewpoint expressed here. Check it out and let me know what you think.


21/1/12
Asda have now redesigned their value range see how it compares to the Morrisons M Savers range


31/1/12
Now that the full range is in store I've reviewed whether this has made a difference to my viewpoint.

14 comments:

  1. You are right, these designs are at least three or four colours (four if a white is required) - they require a black for the barcode and eyemark as the printers were unsure if the spot grey would register!

    Not such a clever piece of design, how can they state it's two colours??

    Completely agree with your ink rationalisation point as well.

    Regards
    Boom boom design (boomboomdesign.co.uk)

    ReplyDelete
  2. Many thanks for your comments. As a part of the team at Coley Porter Bell, we very much appreciate feedback and different viewpoints ....good and bad...on our work. It would seem that this particular project has roused quite some passion, which in our book is better than none at all, as it stimulates us and makes us better at what we do.

    Just one point of clarity however. Coley Porter Bell has never claimed or written that the packaging was created from two colours.....that was an assumption from The Dieline.

    All that said, I will throw my hat in and say that I absolutely believe this new design will out perform the old one easily. Time will tell.....let's see where we are in a few months when all products are in store.

    Regards
    Stephen Bell
    Coley Porter Bell

    ReplyDelete
  3. P.S. forgot to mention that in your INK calculations you don't review quantity of ink used. The previous designs surface area was covered by...let's say 98% as oppose to something more like 25% of the new design.....white for the most part is how the existing substrates (which haven't changed at all) are supplied before the printing of graphics, and given the quantity of print runs, that is a reduction that makes SUN Chemicals less happy. Of course like all environmental calculations, it can be argued/judged from many viewpoints but one thing is for certain.....unless the products sell, all is wasted.

    ReplyDelete
  4. I don't think the amount of colours used on press is the main selling point of the design. It's the fact that it is simple and has personality that makes it different for a value range. And whilst you may not like the style yourself, it is really not debatable that these designs have more charm than the existing ones.
    Nor is it really the point to ever design 'ahead of trend' for retail. Retail design is for a very broad base of consumers and what may be a fashionable style to certain individuals in the know, may be perceived as very fresh and new by others (ie those who are not designers!)
    Perhaps you would like to suggest how better to design a value range for a supermarket both from a design and environmental perspective?

    ReplyDelete
  5. It would be better to design a value range not using 350 colours!! This is NOT environmentally friendly. Too many design agencies do not think about the post design stage and take into account artwork repro and print. If the design agency used one colour this would be more efficient and save on cost - then maybe the price of the product could be lowered even more. People do not by value products for charm and personality!!

    This is a nice design, too nice for the value channel.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Thanks for your comments. Your facts are incorrect however.

      The range consists of 350+ products. You have made the assumption that equals 350 colours. It does not. In total there is a range colour palette of about 25 colours.

      Delete
    2. Hi Stephen, apologies if I miscalculated. Does this mean that there are products in the range that are using the same spot as a variant colour? I am assuming these will be in different categories.

      I should really have focused on the fact that the previous range only used 4 colours to print the entire Value range (including a white) versus the 25 colours in this updated range. It is this that can keep the production costs down to a minimum as there will be less press wash downs if printing back to back. That a side I like the design and think the Sainsbury's Basics like illustrations work well.

      Delete
    3. Hi Stephen, welcome back AGAIN.

      I feel I have some questions on this so have been compelled to respond.

      Are you saying that if we remove black, 405 and white then this entire range prints from 22 Pantones?
      How are you applying this is it one red used to represent strawberry, raspberry and tomato say?
      If so can you confirm that there was no marketing or designers on press 'tweaking' and thereby creating new colour matches?

      i've also added an update 16/1/12, it would be great for some feedback on this viewpoint.

      This is turning into a wonderful debate, thank you for your time.

      PWASO

      Delete
  6. Hi Stephen,

    I respect that you have commented on my blog, great designers stand behind their work.
    I have just commented the below back onto Dieline and this seems relevant to repost here...


    "The beauty of design is that it is speculative. CPB have done some great work in the past, Kotex and Innocent to name a few. I feel that something is missing from this design, a key piece of research or a touch of magic, something that makes it different to the competition. The design feels a little Me2, not with other retailers but the market place in general. I'm a big advocate that the consumer comes first - looking outside in. Morrisons have a very ownable colour palette that is explicitly theirs, CPB could have developed something truly authentic.

    I rate CPB very highly, it is these expectations that have, on this occasion, warranted a negative critique."

    As with any negative press it is also fair that you get the opportunity to officially respond. If you are interested I would be happy to blog your design journey on Morrisons - maybe in the form of an interview or through supplied text. Lets negate the bad with the good.

    ReplyDelete
  7. Thanks for responding. As I mentioned earlier, I have no problem with negative feedback and I appreciate that your blog allows for a two way dialog.....it is interesting and stimulating. However, I think I've said enough now and I'm in danger of sounding boring so I think I will just let the work speak for itself, after all that is what it is designed to do, and if it resonates well with customers, that will be the critique that really counts.

    Many thanks
    Stephen

    ReplyDelete
  8. Interesting debates. I am loving the new Morrisons value range. It is the freshest thing that I have seem in sometime and it makes me think quite differently about Morrisons. Have you seen the new Asda Smartprice value range designed by Elmwood, that has also just launched? I have seen little coverage of it but it definitely worth comparing the two ranges as they are both Value. I think Morrisons wins hands down .

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Thanks you for your feedback.

      I have taken your advice and reviewed the Asda Smart Price range.

      What do you think?

      http://packagedwrappedandslightlyopinionated.blogspot.com/2012/01/asda-smart-price-is-this-smarter-way-to.html

      Delete
  9. Craig Barnes, Coley Porter Bell28 January 2012 15:51

    We have been informed that sales of M Savers are up 25% since the relaunch. That hat you threw into the ring? You just lost it.

    ReplyDelete
  10. Stephen Bell5 April 2012 11:39

    I promised in January that I would report back on the sales results on the M Savers launch. It has now been in Morrisons stores for three months and sales are up by 48% on the old value range and it is also not cutting into sales of more premium ranges.

    Best
    Stephen

    ReplyDelete